Here is a good question, which “parures” people
enjoy to wear the most? The “parures,” refers to two-piece set consisting of a
necklace and earrings. However, these sets could vary to include a brooch,
rather than a necklace, or even all three pieces: earrings, necklace and a
bracelet. By the mid-17th century, jewels had ceased in expectation that
individual works of art in jewelry design is expressing some idea of fancy and
had instead become modest personal ornaments that were beautiful, but lacking
in any deeper significance. Consequently,
as the forms of jewels tended to become stereotyped, the matching set of
jewels, or parures, became the dominant style in jewelry. In the 18th century
the kings of France had parures of great splendor, most made of diamonds. These
pieces including everyday items such as shoe buckles, coat decorations,
insignia, and sword hilts. For state occasions, the 19th-century Napoleonic
court imitated the parures of the ancient régime, with the addition of the
jeweled coronet of classic form.
Here is a strong opinion: to constitute a true
parure, a set of jewelry must have at least three matching items. A set with
only earrings, plus a necklace, brooch, or bracelet is not considered a parure,
but a demi-parure. Deriving from the Old French verb “to adorn,” a parure once
referred to the entire wardrobe or suite of jewelry, often designed to be worn
all at once. The concept derived from its origins in the flamboyance of Baroque
and Rococo-era, France, when aristocrats, both men and women adorned themselves
with elaborate ornamentation, sky-high wigs, and makeup. People say, it’s
extremely rare to find parures from the 18th-century in good condition, while
19th-century sets are slightly more common.
No comments:
Post a Comment